Sunday, August 26, 2018

Spain and the Pyrenees 2018

My daughters wedding in Bordeaux, France gave my son Matt and I the opportunity to do some European touring. In 2013 I did an Edelweiss tour in the Alps which was fantastic and despite doing a number of long trips in Australia and New Zealand, Europe offers a very different experience that I was keen to repeat. Matt had also done an Edelweiss tour and he was very keen too.


Spain is an acknowledged riding Mecca with a huge amount of good quality riding. We contemplated doing an Edelweiss tour, but there was nothing available in the two week window we had in August. So what we had to do was find some bikes to hire, work out a route and organise accommodations and we would be in business.

Planning a good route is pretty hard. The bits and pieces of information available online are sparse, inconsistent and subjective. One of the big advantages of a using a tour company is that they know all the best roads. Luckily, Matt had a good relationship with the leader of his Edelweiss tour who had done a lot of riding in Spain, and Oliver Barrett was kind enough to lend me some maps and documents of the Edelweiss tour of the Pyrenees he did in Spain recently.

A Bulgarian company called Motoroads dominated the search results for motorcycle hire in Spain and so we booked through them. Bikes were supplied by Rent a Tiger in Barcelona. A wide selection of bikes at reasonable rates. Matt was keen on a BMW XR1000 (but this was not available), and I was keen on a Multi 1200 DVT (also not available). What we ended up with was a Multistrada 950 and a KTM 1050 Adventure, both of which turned out to be perfectly suited to the task.

Bikes were ready and waiting when we arrived. The Multi had 6,500 km on the clock, whilst the Kato had over 40,000.

The route we had planned took us from Barcelona, up the Costa Brava, through Andorra into France, through the French Pyrenees and on to San Sebastian in northern Spain where we took a break. We then made our way back on the Spanish side of the Pyrenees to Barcelona. We planned to stay in small towns as they are cheaper and allowed us to plan our rides with no compromises.

(Note: Final route details differ from this map)

We planned to average between 275 and 325 km per day, a moderate touring distance for a comfortable days riding. What we didn’t correctly reckon on was:
  • The traffic; August is peak holiday season in Europe whilst we knew about this it was a lot worse than we anticipated, particularly along the Costa Brava, a big Spanish holiday destination
  • The poor quality of many of the backroads we had chosen in France
For example, we had planned our second day from Saint Feliu du Guixols, a small Catalan town about 150k’s north of Barcelona to Amelie-les-Bains-Palalda (in France) along the coastal road, stopping in at the stunningly beautiful town of Cadaques. This is a truly spectacular coastal road, full of twists and turns but its a simple two lane road for most of the way. A lot of the road is through built up areas with 50kph speed limits full, full, full of people, cars and scooters. So progress was painstakingly slow. And it was really hot for us doing the ATGAT thing ~35° C!

There was a section leading into Cadaques that was bumper to bumper for over 15km moving at ~5km/h in both directions in the blazing sun. We were lucky. We had by this stage learned how to ride in Spanish fashion from watching the locals and wove our way through the traffic, doing stuff that would have had us serving life sentences had we done this in Australia. Not including the stop for lunch we were on the road for 10 and a half hours that day! And then to top it all, we had a two hour hassle with our accomodation so it was a really long day!

The riding

Spanish driver's are very considerate of bikes and give way all the time. So riding is generally very easy and safe there. The roads are excellent for the most part, but they do love their roundabouts! The route we had chosen was superb. We did a lot of the legendary N-240; the main east west highway that skirts the Pyrenees.

The riding in Andorra was particularly spectacular as is the city of Andorra Le Velle. We encountered both magnificent high speed sweepers and super tight switchbacks in one afternoon and as usual, lots of traffic.

We found the roads in France quite varied. The maps and other planning tools we relied on (mainly the Michelin Route Planner) give no indication of the road quality. The route numbers give you a hint but there is no consistency. So some of the roads we went on in France were quite appalling. Very narrow and extremely bumpy. So much so that we struggled to maintain an average speed of 40kph in places. The Multi’s KYB and Sachs suspension, whilst not at all bad on good roads, really struggled to even out the bumps compared to the KTM. By the end of the two days of French backroads, it felt like I had broken some ribs whenever I coughed or sneezed.

The last day we where in France it rained - thankfully. It brought relief from the heat and we decided that it made little sense to keep plugging away on the torturous back roads in the rain so we took the motorway into Spain. Driving on European motorways takes a bit of getting used to. The speed limit can be as high as 130kph, and even then, cars travelling faster than that catch up to you really quickly, and if you are in the fast lane, you need to get out of the way really quickly.




We were very lucky with our timing as it was festival week in San Sebastian, where they host the Annual International Fireworks Display Competition. So for the two nights we were there, we were treated to some of the most spectacular fireworks I have ever seen. Very memorable.

The roads on the trip south on the Spanish side of the mountains were a good deal better. We had a couple of days of arguably the best riding I have ever done between Jaca and Viladrau. No traffic, well cambered curves and tennis court like surface.

But not without risk. As some of the roads are cut into the side of the mountain, there are many, many dangerous blind corners The local drivers tend to use the full width of the road around corners and so you can be at great risk, particularly if you are maintaining an average speed of ~60kph as we were. Bigger vehicles like Land Rovers, are not uncommon and one of these missed Matt by centimetres. He got quite fright and the rest of his days ride was affected.

But in the end we made it back to Barcelona without any mishap other than some brake-fade on the KTM.

One of the little hotels we stayed at in Col de Nargo turned out to be a real treat. They offered to let us park in the lock up garage. The guy who opened the doors for us was the hotel owner. At the back of the garage we spotted some interesting bikes and so our host switched on the lights and showed us around. Turned out that this was the garage of the past Spanish motocross and current Spanish enduro national champion, Jaume Betriu. There was a bunch of bikes in there including a matched set of classic Honda 4's; 350, 500 and 750, all from the same model year in pristine restored condition. Also in the garage were dozens of trophies and top Dakar female racer Laia Sanz's KTM Dakar bike. According to the hotel owner, she is a friend who comes to ride in the area regularly and for whom they are storing the bike. Wow!

Overall, we had a fabulous ride and lot of fun. I would strongly recommend the Spanish Pyrenees as a riding destination. Apart from the great roads, the country is very accommodating, the people are very friendly and enjoyable and the beer is CHEAP! ~€0.50c a can for brands like Heineken and a lot less for the supermarket chain Dia's house brand (which was pretty decent) available at all supermarkets. A similarly sized can of Coke was 10c more.

The Bikes

The Multi 950 was surprisingly good even though it is quite down on power compared to the 1200 Multi. It is very manageable and easy to get along with. It handles quite well and the engine is willing and able and makes a great Ducati sound. The major difference compared to my multi is that there is very little below about 3,500 rpm; make that 4,000 rpm, so one has to anticipate downshifts more precisely, particularly in the tighter stuff. On the 130kph freeways, it is revving at ~6,500rpm. Pretty buzzy. The KTM’s engine felt a lot rougher but it had more bottom end. The KTM’s gearing is also longer and better suited to tight mountain roads; once in third, it could be left there whereas on the Multi, one had to shift back to second a lot of the time to get decent drive out of the corners.

Suspension: The KTM was softer and more compliant than the Multi. After I adjusted the rear preload and rebound damping on the Multi, handling improved appreciably but it never matched the KTM in terms of comfort. I think that White Power suspension has the edge over Sachs.

Wind protection: Multi has it over the Kato. Both in design and in function There is appreciably less buffeting with the windshield in the high position compared to the KTM. Believe me after 10 hours of riding, this makes a big difference. The Multis windscreen adjustment is the best!

Brakes: KTM’s brakes are stronger but on this particular example, the rear brakes faded abruptly on several occasions. The Multi’s brakes are not its strongest point, particularly the rear brake. Strange - the Brembo calipers looked to be identical on both bikes but the performance was definitely not.

Gearbox and clutch: The KTM has a hydraulic clutch. It is a lot smoother and requires less effort than the Multi's  but the gearbox is clunky compared. When cold it was really difficult to pull away smoothly with the Multi's cable operated clutch.

Luggage: The  KTM’s panniers are roomier but also a bit wider than the Multi’s. I found the left hand pannier on the Multi always fiddly to get on and off. The straps that hold the luggage in place internally on the Multi make a lot more sense to me than the net that comes inside the lid of the KTM’s panniers.

Fuel consumption: The KTM was marginally heavier. The Multi gave a fuel consumption of between 16 and 19 km/l. The price of petrol was notably higher than in Australia. The price was around €1.50 (~AUD 2.40) a litre.

Tyres: The Multi was still on the original Pirelli Scorpion Trail II’s. These tyres have a flatter profile than the Angel GT’s that I am used to and I could feel it. There is less rubber on the road when you are leaned over and the bike does not feel as secure as my 1200 Multi in the corners, but the lighter weight of the bike made it more agile in the tight stuff. The KTM had a set of Dunlop’s fitted. The rear wheel is narrower and the tyre is smaller than the Multi’s, but with a rounder profile. As a result it tipped in very easlyand felt very stable and secure.

The KTM is a good machine but overall we both preferred riding the Multi. It is simply more refined, more comfortable and more fun.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Mods and Farkles 5: A Chain Oiler for the Multistrada

A Chain Oiler for the Multistrada

I managed to get 24,000km on the Multi's OEM Regina chain, which by popular account is not the best quality chain available.  Towards the end of its life, I noticed that two or three links in that chain were stiff and had clearly suffered a lubrication failure. My understanding of modern o-ring chains was that they were essentially sealed and needed very little external lubrication. Wrong. Chain life is a function of maintenance so anything you can do in this regard is going to lengthen its life and save you money.

According to some, the factory lube is only good for 1-2,000 km. The O-rings (usually X-ring's in fact) are definitely damaged by dust and they do dry out and deteriorate over time, letting lubricant out and wear inducing dirt in. What's more, the various spray-on chain lubes that most people use are for the most part, not a great lubrication solution. They are formulated primarily to stay on the chain and not fling off - thick and sticky; some of the wax types don't even attempt to provide proper lubrication to the bearing surfaces in the chain where the wear takes place. So in general these products are not optimal, despite the hyped up advertising copy. So with all that in mind, 24,000 km was not at all bad.

I have always been aware of chain oilers, but thought they were archaic and of little value in the age of O-ring chains. Talking to Multistrada owners with chain oilers, I was astonished to learn that 50-60,000 km is commonly achieved with a chain oiler! This was corroborated by many, many forum posts and articles that I read.

Automatic chain oilers provide continuous or regular oil to the chain to keep the O-rings constantly lubricated. Furthermore, in the rain, the oil displaces the water and goes a long way to prevent water ingress into the bearing surfaces of the links. Similar for dust and dirt. With the oil flow rate correctly set, there is a degree of fling-off from the chain. Dust is picked up by the oil and removed from the chain by the fling-off mechanism.  For the chain oiler to work optimally, ideally the flow rate needs to be increased or decreased depending on riding conditions - more oil for rain or dust, less for regular highway riding. The rate that oil is dispensed is quite important. Too much and you will have oil all over the place; especially on you back wheel but potentially flinging onto your panniers (if you use them) and dripping out of the front sprocket recess, where the g-forces on the oil are strongest. Too little oil is too little to do the job. There's more to it than just that, oil fling-off works differently at low speed than at highway speed. At highway speed, there are aerodynamic effects that produce turbulence around the rear sprocket. This works to draw the oil fling-off onto the rear tyre and wheel as opposed to city speeds where this does not occur so much. So, ideally the oil flow rate should compensate for highway speed usage.

There are a number of chain oilers on the market. Some of them are simple mechanical devices, others quite sophisticated, electronically controlled units. The simple mechanical type offer fixed flow rates - not that useful for a multi-purpose bike like a Multistrada but better than nothing and cost effective. Some of the products come with or require the use of special oil. I could not see much validity for this need.

I researched all the chain oilers I could find:

ProductConstructionFlow ControlControlFeedTriggerFOB price in AUD*
LoobmanunitaryFixed/Manual-gravityManual34.52
Tutorounitary
Fixed/Manual
MechanicalgravityVibration132.39
Motobriizunitary
Fixed/Manual
Windair pressureAir speed153.36
PD Oiler
modular
Dynamic/Variable
ElectronicpumpTimer160.22
Cameleon
unitary
Fixed/Manual
ElectronicpumpTimer184.20
Scottoiler Vunitary
Fixed/Manual
Vacuum
gravity
Timer
191.10
OSCOunitary
Fixed/Manual
MechanicalgravityManual211.00
Pro-Oilermodular
Dynamic/Variable
ElectronicpumpGPS/Distance**235-337.28
Scottoiler Emodular
Dynamic/Variable
ElectronicpumpTimer400.03***
* Converted from source currency as of 15 June 2016
** Pro-Oiler is available without GPS module, using a magnetic pick-up
*** In Australia the RP for the ScottoilerE is $449.95 from the Australian importers website

unitary: all major components in a single unit
flow control: how the oil flow can be varied:
  • Fixed/Manual - flow can be varied manually while stopped
  • Dynamic/Variable - flow adjustable whilst on the move
control: how flow is controlled
feed: what caused the oil to flow
trigger: how is oil flow triggered

Flow Control and TriggerMechanism

The two main variables are flow control and trigger mechanism. Some units are totally manually operated. Others are gravity fed and some have mechanical pumps. Pumps add complexity but give more mounting options as they can be mounted almost anywhere on the bike compared to gravity fed units. Flow rate can also be very accurately controlled with a pump.

As mentioned above, ideally the amount of oil released (flow control) needs to be regulated to cope with the requirements of varying conditions. A variety of flow control mechanisms exist. Logically, it would seem that distance travelled is the most appropriate metric to base oil flow regulation. The Pro-Oiler is the only product that meters oil based on actual distance travelled.

For me a key criterion  was to be able to vary the flow rate to adjust for prevailing conditions while on the move. So it was a toss up between the Pro-Oiler and the Scottoiler E.

The ScottolierE uses an accelerometer to sense vibration and acceleration that it uses to regulate flow. From the product literature it seems that once the unit has decided you are on the move, oil flow is regulated on a variable timing basis. The Pro-Oiler has two options for flow regulation. One can install a sensor that counts wheel revolutions, or as an option you can purchase a GPS module that measures distance and speed. The GPS option is easier and a lot quicker to install.

On the surface, it seems there is little to choose between these two products. Both seem functionally equivalent and quite capable of doing a good job. But if you are inclined to look below the surface there are some major differences.

I opted for the Pro-Oiler for the following reasons:
  1. On the Multistrada the working components could be mounted in a totally concealed and convenient fashion. I could not find a suitable spot for the Scottoiler pump/reservoir unit; all the usual mounting points on my bike were already occupied. Most of the Scottoiler installations I have seen on the Multistrada, place it under a screw-in body panel, making refilling a chore. The Pro-Oiler's separate oil bottle gives more mounting flexibility and potentially easier access for refilling purposes. 
  2. The sophistication of the Pro-Oiler's oil feed control seems to be a cut above any other product. If you choose to, you can make a range of adjustments to adjust the oil delivery rate to suite any riding condition, although it is pre-set-up ready to use out of the box. Ideal oil delivery is a function of distance and speed with manual adjustment to deal with environmental variations. As such you can achieve optimum lubrication with minimum fling-off more accurately than any of the other products.

    If the GPS signal is lost (or the distance signal is lost if one is not using the GPS module) the unit automatically reverts to "emergency mode" after 15 minutes, which meters oil on a timed basis, like many of the other oilers on the market. One can also invoke emergency mode manually if required from the control panel and flow rate can also be adjusted in this mode to deal with more extreme usage environments such as off road or desert conditions. 
  3. It places no requirement on the type of oil that can be used. The Scottoiler is supposed to be used with their 'special' oil at $16.95 for 500 ml.
  4. Complete with GPS unit, it is ~$100 less costly than the ScottoilerE in Australia.
The Pro-Oiler comprises an oil reservoir bottle, a pump, a control unit, a junction box (that connects all the components together), the GPS sensor and of course various pieces of tubing and a two sided feed nozzle. Although this seems like a lot of components, it gives a lot of mounting flexibility. The GPS and junction box are match-box sized items and can be easily tucked away. The control unit is  a bit bigger and it's best to mount it in an accessible location. There are installation instructions for various bikes on the Pro Oiler website. Assorted mounting accessories such as zip ties and Dual Lock are supplied. When ordering, you need to provide your bike make and model. Presumably this is so that you are supplied with appropriate hardware to mount the feed nozzle properly and a correctly pre-set control unit suited to your particular bike.

Installation of the Pro-Oiler on my 2012 Multistrada Sport

The Pro-Oiler website suggest that the oil reservoir bottle be mounted in the tool compartment of the Multistrada. I was not in favour of this as that space is precious and is already used for my tyre repair kit, pump and some tools. Also, the bottle needs to be located conveniently for filling.. After a close examination, I discovered that the Multistrada 'Central Blackbox" (that's it's official designation), is mounted on a hollow triangular shaped plastic bracket under the seat alongside the ABS pump under the seat. I removed the bracket, cut one side off and reinforced it with a 3mm piece of aluminium sheet that I cut into a L shape to fit the original mounting holes. This opens up enough space for the reservoir bottle to fit snugly under the seat, while the black box position is not altered at all. The bottle is held in place with a wire collar as illustrated below. (As an alternative, the plastic oil bottle can be reshaped by heating with a heat gun and as such made to fit tight areas - a handy feature)

The GPS unit and junction box were Dual Locked into position as illustrated. Power is taken from the tail light circuit accessible from the relay behind the battery using a supplied Posi-lock connector.


The oil pump was mounted under the body panel on the RHS frame alongside the regulator.


The oil line crosses the frame on the swing arm mount and emerges on the bottom of the swing arm where it connects to the Pro-Oiler dispensing nozzle, held in place with the supplied bracket.


The control unit is mounted to my LHS "hiss flap" with Dual Lock.


The oiler appears to be functioning correctly. The flow rate can be conveniently adjusted with the + or - button while on the move. The unit can be set very precisely in terms of wheel revolutions (or metres travelled) per pump stroke, although this is unnecessary as it comes pre-set for your bike. Once installed, the system needs to be primed using a button sequence on the control unit until oil flows. I have experimented with the unit to examine at first hand the effect of the adjustments. I am please to report that it works exactly as expected. In fact on a recent ride on a completely overcast day, the GPS module lost satellite contact and I was pleased to see that the unit had switched into emergency mode as expected.

In all this is the best chain oiler solution and it can be neatly and unobtrusively installed.